The Leper is good at giving Robert reasons for why staying alive by not overtly favoring either side of the issue is best—and Robert accepts all the rationale.
But by doing so, he turns his back on his obligation to the commoners. You think the people of this country exist to provide you with position. I think your position exists to provide those people with freedom. Robert knows what is right, but other people more ambitious and less scrupulous have a strong influence on him. The Scots sustain great losses, losses that Robert knows would have been considerably less had he kept his promise.
The consequences torment him. Noble and common, they respect you. And so would I. Robert the Bruce leaves everyone off-balance by one minute by saying he is going to support Wallace, and the next not getting involved or by siding with the enemy.
Robert must envision his responsibility towards Scotland and the Scottish people, as well as his role in the fight for freedom if he is to have any effect. From the start, Robert tells the nobles and the audience that he speaks for his absent father The Leper and for Scotland. So would I. Commanded to protect Longshanks, Robert knocks the injured Wallace from his horse. Yet with the help of Stephen, he is able to save William from onrushing English soldiers.
Eventually, a meeting at Edinburgh Castle is called so that the Scottish nobles can give Wallace their pledge and unite against the English. This, however, unbeknownst to Robert, is a mere ruse.
Robert, the 17th Earl of Bruce, is in line for the throne of Scotland. And being born and raised in the lap of ease, he has no desire to see any radical changes, except to see Scotland ruled once again by its own king. Hate and true suffering have rarely touched him.
Neither William nor Robert is much inclined to yield. Robert subconsciously wants to be like William, he wants the respect that William commands. William subconsciously sees Robert as the ultimate hope for Scotland. However, William sees his dream as something worth fighting, and even dying, for. Robert sees it from a more pragmatic, albeit circumscribed, perspective. And when the Bruce betrays him at Falkirk, this hope is well-nigh taken from him.
Before Falkirk, William has hope. In the end, hope beckons again:. William has control over the commoners but not enough clout to gain the cooperation of the Scottish nobles and their armies. He knows he must get Robert the Bruce to take control. Little does he understand, however, that Robert is controlled by his conniving father.
I want you to die! But Robert sees the logic behind keeping Longshanks at bay by neither actively supporting nor opposing him. Not until Robert possesses the same sort of hatred, will he be an effective leader.
Even his father realizes this. William has set his hopes on Robert uniting the clans to fight the English at Falkirk. So how does it help us to join the side that is slaughtered? Wallace used the land and its natural features to win the battle. The Scottish were victorious, but Murray was wounded and must have died either during the battle or after that. Wallace was undoubtedly patriotic, both in the film and in history. He had no intention of submitting to the English laws.
One year after the victorious battle at Stirling Bridge p. In the movie, it was depicted that Robert the Bruce betrayed him, yet it was not the real case in history.
It deeply affected him. Then he left Scotland p. Few years after his resignation, Bruce arranged some peace plans with Longshanks without the blessing of Wallace. He was caught, put on trial and executed for treason p. This same event happened in history as well which means that the film was accurate on this incident.
His body was quartered, and his limbs were sent to Newcastle, Berwick, Stirling, and Aberdeen to serve as a warning to the people p. It was recorded in history and happened on 23 rd August He died, yet nobody could deny his patriotism to Scotland, not driven by greed, money, title, or lands, but for his mere love of his country and freedom from the English rule. These intrigues have resulted in enormous popularity of the movie. Those who have seen the movie had solidified the image of William Wallace in their heads as to what they see in the film, not the one found in the history of Scotland.
Unfortunately, many stories are heard and written about this courageous, patriotic Scottish hero that cannot be proven with historical documents. However, historians are trying to reconcile the truth with what really happened in the past by continuously looking for evidences.
In the end, one can only remember the heroic blood of Sir William Wallace that was spilled for the freedom of his land and people. His memory continually inspires the people, not just the Scottish, to continue loving their country and to guard their country against tyranny or any act that could threaten their freedom. Why should we forget the facts and tell a story: Why Braveheart is a classic despite its inaccuracies?
Well you leave me with little choice. I recently watched the movie Anonymous , a historical thriller with an intellectual twist.
Nevertheless, critics panned Anonymous. It certainly gives me hope for his slow-gestating Foundation trilogy , if that project ever seen the light of day. The reason people hated the movie is that it seemed truthful, when in fact it was not.
Lying about history is something of a crime in our culture, one that irks no group so much as it does the scholars—and there are more scholars of Shakespeare than of any other storyteller in memory. The entire episode reminded me of another controversy: the one surrounding the movie Braveheart.
The movie was a tour de force at the box office, going on to win five Oscars including the award for Best Picture , and remains one of the most beloved historical films of all time. Braveheart is an excellent movie. My six elements of a story world are met in spades: fascinating world 13 th century Britain ; compelling characters Wallace, Longshanks, Robert the Bruce ; gripping plot he woos a Princess?!
My own relationship with Braveheart could be called love at first sight. After forty-five minutes of William Wallace leading the lovely Murron into secret forest clearings, I changed my mind: clearly this was a classical romance. Only once the local magistrate sliced her throat did I figure out that these Scots were going to war—and from there forward the movie had me by the bollocks.
You see, for all its sweeping depictions of medieval Britain, it turns out the film was wildly inaccurate. Dates were wrong. Events were fabricated. Characters were presented out of context. And the kilts. Now, what does this mean for my teenage love affair with Braveheart? Great stories are about worlds, characters, events, and themes. Great stories touch our hearts and stir our souls, and they reveal deep truths about human life.
What great stories are not about—and never have been about—is facts. Stories do, of course, contain facts. Star Wars , for instance, owes its existence to certain facts of astrophysics e. Harry Potter draws its humor from certain facts of British life, but there is in truth no Hogwarts. I think. Where we get confused is in understanding the nature of history. History is not a thing of facts and dates. Sorry every history teacher I ever had. Knowing certain historical facts can be helpful, but what matters is understanding the essence of our past.
This brings us to another idea, which is the grey line between history and mythology. History starts to become mythology as soon as the ink is put on the page—names and dates might be accurate, but what really happened, and how it happened, and what it meant, are an interpretation. Julius Caesar might be a historial figure, but he is also a myth.
How else could Dante have put Brutus and Cassius in the mouths of Satan? So while scholars are free to rigorously debate the details of Scottish independence—not to mention the questionable authorship of Troilus and Cressida —I think the true significance of the two Williams has to do with their place as mythical figures.
These men became legends. The details of their lives are not so important as the virtues for which their names became known. Any story that brings attention to their tales is just another piece of the mythology.
Because in the end, what we remember are stories, tales, legends, and myths—the intangible essence that makes history meaningful. In fact, it might even be myth in the making. You are commenting using your WordPress. You are commenting using your Google account.
You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email. Young Soldier : Home! The English are too many!
Young Soldier : William Wallace is seven feet tall! Can you give me a reaction on the film Braveheart? Can you give me a in depth analysis of the story development of the film Braveheart?
And although eventually he has to change his attitude towards the Scottish nobles, his determination to get Scotland free of England remains as solid as a rock. STOP Main Character Growth Wallace, like the audience, is waiting for England to stop its oppression and domination of Scotland; waiting for the Scottish lords to stop their cross-purposes and unite against England.
His last option for securing Scottish freedom is Robert the Bruce. Overall Story Through line England has taken Scotland for itself, attempting to suppress the natives through harsh and unjust laws.
William and his men are concerned that the Scots and their culture will have no future if they are ruled by England. The Scottish lords are concerned that if they support Wallace, Longshanks will take away all they have—-even their very lives.
The Scottish nobles choose protecting their own status over their obligation to the commoners. The Bruce delays his commitment to Wallace out of filial obligation. The nobles delay their commitment to Wallace for fear of losing what they have. Overall Story Thematic Conflict Choice vs. You mean us and you. William subconsciously sees Robert as the ultimate hope for Scotland. Relationship Story Thematic Conflict Dream vs. Hope Before Falkirk, William has hope.
What happens in and to the country will affect all their futures. This is a moral issue and even the Scottish nobles feel uneasy about it. Anarchism and National Liberation This does not mean, however, that anarchist are indifferent to national liberation struggles.
Two approaches to the problem Like the good Social Democrat he was, Lenin supported the right of nations to self-determination. What is the messianic symbolism of Braveheart? Princess Isabelle : The king desires peace. William Wallace : Longshanks desires peace? Princess Isabelle : Peace is made in such ways. What did you think about the character Christopher Wallace in the Film Braveheart? What are some Christian themes in the film Braveheart?
What are the inaccuracies of the film Braveheart? Share this: Twitter Facebook. Like this: Like Loading Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:. Email required Address never made public. Name required. Information This entry was posted on April 20, by theeuphoricalangel07 in Uncategorized. Navigation Previous post. Next post. Search for:.
Categories chivalry knighthood nation building Uncategorized. Blog at WordPress. Follow Following. Sign me up. Already have a WordPress. Log in now. Loading Comments Email Required Name Required Website.
William steadfastly fights the English in spite of the odds. Wallace, like the audience, is waiting for England to stop its oppression and domination of Scotland; waiting for the Scottish lords to stop their cross-purposes and unite against England.
The murder of Murron forces William to decide to give up his neutrality and fight. William can only do so much without the support of the Scottish nobles, their armies, and their clansmen. Longshanks is concerned that if the French see that England cannot subjugate the entire island, there will be very little future for English interests and influence on the continent.
Choice vs. William is the only one who lives by his conscience. Longshanks and the Scottish nobility come to realize that the only way to stop William and the spread of his reputation of legendary proportions is to tempt him with the very thing Wallace wants: A promise of Scottish unity. Because Longshanks cannot manipulate Wallace like he can the less scrupulous Scottish lords, he has to use different logic.
The King of England, Edward I, rules his domain with absolute authority. Robert subconsciously wants to be like William, he wants the respect that William commands. Both William and Robert dream of the same thing. William has control over the commoners but not enough clout to gain the cooperation of the Scottish nobles and their armies. The Scottish patriot, William Wallace, has the backing of a good percentage of the common Scottish population but knows that what Scotland really needs is a leader who can rally all the classes, and he sees that capability in the 17th Earl of Bruce.
William is born a commoner whose hard life of physical labor has prepared him for difficulties and action. The Central goal of all the characters revolves around the future of Scotland. If Scotland fails to achieve independence, hatred and war will continue, with great loss of life on both sides, and loss of any kind of peaceful existence.
Second, the effect depends on how the message restricting our freedom is phrased. The use of forceful and controlling language should, ought, must, need , results in a greater Braveheart effect than non-controlling language consider, can, could, may. Third, it depends on who you are. The extent to which you experience the effect is a personality trait. Questionnaires can measure it. Some people are more disposed to experience the Braveheart effect than others.
Finally, culture plays a role. People from more individualistic cultures such as Britain experience a stronger Braveheart effect when their personal freedom is threatened than when their group freedom is threatened. In contrast, people from more collectivist cultures such as China show the opposite pattern. But why do we experience the Braveheart effect? Social psychologist Jonathan Haidt argues that our ancient ancestors had to solve the problem of living in small groups with others who, given the chance, would try to dominate and constrain them.
He proposes that natural selection favoured those who responded to such attempts with righteous anger. Those experiencing the Braveheart effect would be less likely to lose out on food and mates.
Introduction 2. Personality Era 1. Influence Era 1. Strengths and Weakness of Tents-R-Us 6. We think of heroes being larger than life, possessing impeccable honor, integrity, strong leadership and having the higher moral ground. However, tragic heroes are different; they are imperfect and will inevitably face a tragic downfall. Per Aristotle, there are several different specific attributes necessary in a tragic hero, including noble status.
In the movie Braveheart you can discover the specifics of one man who assumes numerous difficulties of life and in battle. William Wallace established numerous leadership skills that assisted his army in being successful as an underdog.
Several of the abilities Wallace utilized are usual in current day industry leaders. Organizational Change in Braveheart The movie "Braveheart" is a movie in which you can uncover the indirect elements of a man that deals with several problems of life and fight.
0コメント